Gladys Wanga is facing growing criticism as questions emerge over development in Homa Bay County, with many residents and observers arguing that her leadership has not delivered visible results despite available resources.
The concerns reflect a wider frustration across the country, where some leaders are accused of expecting praise and recognition without matching their words with tangible work on the ground.
This debate has intensified at a time when county governments are expected to drive development and improve the lives of ordinary citizens.
Instead, a number of counties are now under scrutiny for what many describe as misplaced priorities and slow or unclear progress.
The conversation gained momentum after a widely circulated card linked to Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo questioned development in Kiambu County and raised concerns about the source of funding behind projects associated with Governor Kimani Wamatangi.
However, the discussion appears to have had an unintended effect, drawing more attention to what is happening on the ground in Kiambu.
Kiambu County has in recent months presented a range of projects that are visible and easy to verify.
These include the construction of 512 ECDE centres, the establishment of six Level Four hospitals and 26 Level Three hospitals, and the installation of 12,000 solar streetlights.
In addition, more than 600,000 farmers have reportedly benefited from farm input programmes aimed at improving food production and supporting rural incomes.
These are not just plans on paper but projects that residents can see and use in their daily lives.
As a result, comparisons have started to emerge, with many people asking why similar progress is not visible in other counties.
Homa Bay County has increasingly come into focus in this discussion. Critics argue that the pace and visibility of development under Gladys Wanga do not match public expectations. While some counties are investing heavily in healthcare, early education and agriculture, others appear to lag behind, with few major projects to point to despite receiving significant funding.
This has led to a national conversation about accountability and performance in devolved units.
Residents and analysts are now asking direct questions about how public funds are being used and what impact they are having on communities.
The issue is no longer about political rivalry but about measurable results.
Leave feedback about this