Africa Nazarene University (ANU), once considered a leading institution of higher learning, is facing an internal crisis as students, staff, and members of the surrounding community call for a leadership overhaul.
The Vice Chancellor, Dr. Stanley Makhosi Bhebhe, is at the center of the storm, with accusations mounting that he has failed to effectively lead and transform the university.
The discontent appears to stem from a combination of administrative inefficiencies, declining standards, and what critics describe as a lack of accountability from the institution’s top management.
One of the most pressing issues raised is the alleged failure to adapt to post-pandemic realities.
According to insiders, senior managers, including the Human Capital Director, have maintained a work-from-home culture despite the easing of COVID-19 restrictions.
This approach has reportedly disrupted operations, hindered decision-making processes, and weakened accountability structures.
The situation has left many questioning the commitment of the leadership team to the university’s success, with critics arguing that a physical presence is essential for proper oversight and engagement.
Students, who are among the most affected, have expressed their frustrations over a range of issues, including delays in administrative processes, lack of proper academic guidance, and inadequate support services.
These shortcomings, they argue, have made their learning experience unnecessarily difficult.
Many have pointed out that the leadership’s absence from campus has left them feeling neglected and unsupported, further eroding confidence in the institution’s ability to deliver quality education.
Staff members have also voiced their grievances, highlighting the strain caused by a disjointed and unresponsive management structure.
Some have accused the Vice Chancellor of turning a blind eye to inefficiencies and failing to address critical issues affecting their work environment.
The lack of a clear and coherent strategy to move the university forward has, according to them, created an atmosphere of uncertainty and low morale.
The surrounding community has not been spared either.
Many community members, who once regarded the university as a beacon of hope and development, now see it as a shadow of its former self.
Reports of poor engagement with local stakeholders and a failure to uphold the university’s mission of community transformation have further fueled dissatisfaction.
Critics argue that this decline is a direct result of weak leadership and a lack of visionary planning.
The calls for a leadership overhaul are growing louder, with some stakeholders suggesting that Dr. Bhebhe’s tenure has done more harm than good.
They believe that a change at the top is necessary to restore confidence, revitalize the university, and steer it back to its original mission.
Whether these demands will lead to changes remains to be seen, but the damage to the university’s reputation under the current leadership is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.
Leave feedback about this