Lawyer Nelson Havi has made bold remarks following the withdrawal of Chief Justice Martha Koome’s security detail.
His statements add to the heated debate about the state of leadership in the Judiciary under her stewardship.
Havi’s criticism revolves around his claim that Koome has lost public confidence, a crucial element for anyone leading such a big institution in Kenya.
According to him, the Chief Justice has failed to maintain the integrity and trust that the public expects from the head of the Judiciary.
Havi argues that the Chief Justice is no longer viewed as a symbol of justice and fairness by the public.
This perception, he says, has created a serious trust gap between the Judiciary and Kenyans.
He further states that Koome’s inability to uphold these values has led to widespread discontent and disillusionment, which undermines the critical role of the Judiciary in upholding the rule of law.
The lawyer also points out that Koome has lost public goodwill, which he believes is vital for the Judiciary to function effectively.
According to him, the narratives previously used to defend her leadership no longer resonate with the public.
Havi accuses her of poor public relations, stating that she has failed to manage how the public views her leadership.
He claims this failure has resulted in her losing what he describes as the “propaganda war” and the “publicity battle,” which are important in shaping public trust and confidence.
Havi goes further to allege that Chief Justice Koome has resorted to spreading falsehoods to defend herself.
He believes this tactic only serves to weaken her credibility and diminish the dignity of the Judiciary.
Instead of addressing the real concerns raised about her leadership, Havi accuses her of deflecting responsibility and denying accountability, which he says only worsens the situation.
According to Havi, these issues make Koome a liability to the Judiciary.
He asserts that her actions and decisions have caused damage to the public’s trust in the institution, which is a dangerous development for Kenya’s democracy and legal system.
He warns that the continued erosion of public confidence in the Judiciary threatens the rule of law and undermines justice in the country.
Havi concludes by calling for Koome’s resignation, insisting that her continued leadership will only make things worse.
He emphasizes the need for new leadership to restore public trust and ensure the institution upholds the principles of justice and fairness.
His remarks mirror the growing frustration among Kenyans regarding accountability and leadership in high offices, particularly within the Judiciary.
Leave feedback about this