Popular Kenyan blogger Cyprian Nyakundi has alleged that he was offered Ksh. 30 million to stop supporting the “Occupy State House” movement.
According to him, those behind the offer wanted him to shift the blame for the protests onto Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. He claims that several individuals approached him with the money, hoping to influence his stance on the demonstrations.
Despite the large sum involved, he rejected the offer, stating that it was an attempt to manipulate public opinion and mislead Kenyans.
Nyakundi further revealed that he had seen drafts of tweets from other influencers before they were posted.
He alleges that some of these influencers had accepted payments to push a specific narrative. This, according to him, is part of a larger scheme to control political discussions in Kenya by using social media as a tool to mislead the public.
He insists that the attempt to buy his silence did not succeed and maintains that he has no regrets about turning down the money.
His claims have triggered widespread discussions online, with many people questioning the extent of political influence in Kenya. The allegations come at a time when young Kenyans continue to express frustration with the government, citing issues such as high living costs, unemployment, and unfulfilled promises.
Many have taken to social media to voice their concerns, making the “Occupy State House” movement a trending topic.
Meanwhile, another social media personality, Gidi Kariuki, expressed his discomfort with the idea of storming State House. He later suggested that Kenyans would eventually be judged based on their voting decisions. His statement has fueled more debate, with some agreeing that elections are the root of the current frustrations, while others insist that immediate action is necessary to hold leaders accountable.
Nyakundi’s revelations have raised concerns about efforts to control public opinion through paid influencers. Many Kenyans are now questioning the credibility of political narratives that emerge on social media.
Some have called on authorities to investigate the alleged bribery attempts and expose those behind them.
Others see this as proof that powerful figures are determined to suppress dissent by any means necessary.The controversy has also reignited debates about the role of social media in shaping political events in Kenya. With platforms like X and Facebook being used to mobilize protests and shape discourse, many believe that the fight for transparency is far from over.
The influence of money in political discussions remains a significant concern, and Nyakundi’s claims have only added fuel to the fire.
The bigger question remains, who is truly in control of public opinion in Kenya?
Leave feedback about this