Junet Mohamed Exposed As Controversial Remarks And Reports Of Betrayal Tarnish His Leadership

National Assembly Minority Leader Junet Mohamed has once again drawn sharp criticism, this time for his suggestion to eliminate public participation in government development projects.

His controversial remarks in Taita Taveta reflect a pattern of questionable leadership and perceived self-interest that has plagued his political career.


Junet, who equated government decision-making to household matters, argued that involving stakeholders such as citizens, civil society, and religious groups only delays progress.

However, his statements have amplified accusations that he disregards the democratic principles meant to ensure transparency and accountability.

Public participation is a constitutional requirement in Kenya, and many see his comments as a reckless attempt to undermine the checks and balances necessary to protect public resources.

Beyond this incident, Junet’s leadership in Suna East has been marred by allegations of neglect and broken promises.

Residents of his constituency have accused him of failing to deliver essential services such as electricity, with many homes still lacking power despite campaign promises.

There have also been claims of discrimination in distributing bursaries, with reports that students from families perceived as unsupportive of Junet’s politics are often sidelined.

Junet’s political loyalty has also raised eyebrows.

As a close ally of ODM leader Raila Odinga, Junet has been a vocal critic of President William Ruto.

However, his recent actions, including a public apology to Ruto for past campaign remarks and his endorsement of Ruto’s appointments of ODM allies to government positions, suggest a willingness to switch allegiances when it serves his interests.

This perceived inconsistency has fueled accusations of opportunism and betrayal among his ODM supporters.

Furthermore, Junet has faced criticism for his handling of national issues.

His defense of controversial infrastructure projects involving foreign investors, such as the canceled Adani Group deals, has raised questions about his priorities.

Critics argue that Junet prioritizes appeasing powerful interests over advocating for proper oversight and public benefit.

In light of these controversies, Junet’s credibility as a leader is under intense scrutiny.

His remarks on public participation have not only sparked a national debate but have also highlighted deeper concerns about his commitment to democratic values and his effectiveness in serving both his constituents and the nation at large.