Tension continue to rise across the country following the murder of Albert Ojwang. This comes after a statement from lawyer Nelson Havi, who directly accused Eliud Lagat of being behind the killing. Havi’s words have caused a major stir online, with many Kenyans expressing anger, suspicion, and concern.
He firmly stated that Lagat is the main suspect and should face murder charges whether or not he personally carried out the act.
This claim has now become one of the most discussed topics online, as people try to make sense of what really happened and who is responsible.
Havi’s statement, widely shared on social media, is now the focus of public attention. It has raised serious questions about how justice is handled in Kenya and whether political connections are at play.
While some people support Havi’s boldness, others are warning against rushing to conclusions before investigations are complete.
One of the most striking reactions came from someone named Michuki, who used a creative example to explain the fear people have in the justice system.
He compared the situation to an antelope running in fear during a goat raid, showing how many feel that innocent people can be wrongly accused or caught in endless legal battles.
Kevin, another social media user, advised people to wait for the investigation results before blaming anyone.
He reminded the public that even suspects have the right to a fair trial. Kevin’s message was echoed by many who believe that accusing someone without solid proof could lead to injustice and set a dangerous precedent.
On the other hand, Jarry questioned Havi’s consistency. He asked whether Havi would defend Lagat if the suspect came to him for legal help.
Jarry accused Havi of using public emotions for personal gain and warned that such actions could damage national peace and stability.
Another voice, Lambus, who claimed to have legal knowledge, argued that Havi was ignoring important legal principles.
He reminded everyone that murder charges require strong evidence, not just statements on social media.
Lambus criticized what he called attention-seeking tactics and warned that such behavior could weaken the legal process and affect the outcome of the case.
Leave feedback about this