Charles Hinga’s false promises exposed as Alice Wahome insensitively calls Housing Levy a tax

Land CS Alice Wahome has recently made a statement that has sparked a lot of discussion and debate. She has said that the Housing Levy is a tax.

This statement is quite different from what Housing and Urban Development PS Charles Hinga said on March 24, 2023.

At that time, Hinga had described the Housing Levy as a saving. This contradiction has left many people confused and wondering what the Housing Levy really is.

The Housing Levy was introduced as part of the government’s efforts to provide affordable housing for all citizens. The idea was to collect funds from workers and use that money to build houses.

When PS Charles Hinga spoke about it in March 2023, he explained that the levy was a way for people to save money for their future homes. He said that the money collected would be used to build houses, and those who contributed would eventually benefit from the program by getting a house.

This explanation made many people feel that the levy was a good idea because it seemed like a way to save for something important.

However, Land CS Alice Wahome’s recent statement has changed the way people see the Housing Levy. By calling it a tax, she has made it seem like the money collected is not a voluntary saving but a mandatory payment to the government.

This has led to concerns among workers who feel that they are being forced to pay for something they might not benefit from directly. Many people are now questioning whether the Housing Levy is fair and whether it will really help them get a house in the future.

The difference between a tax and a saving is major. A tax is something that people have to pay, and the government decides how to use that money. A saving, on the other hand, is money that people set aside for their own future use.

When the Housing Levy was described as a saving, it gave people hope that they were investing in their own future. But now, with CS Alice Wahome calling it a tax, it feels more like an additional burden on workers who are already struggling with high living costs.

This contradiction between the two officials has caused confusion and frustration among the public. People want to know the truth about the Housing Levy. Is it a tax or a saving? Will the money collected really be used to build houses, or will it go into the general government fund?

These are important questions that need clear answers. The government needs to provide more information and clarify the purpose of the Housing Levy to regain the trust of the people. Until then, the debate over whether it is a tax or a saving will continue, and many workers will remain unsure about what they are really paying for.