Pressure is mounting on Johnson Sakaja over the growing cost of his advisory team, with questions emerging about the need for multiple advisors in roles already covered within the county government.
Senators and residents are now demanding clear justification for the spending.
At the center of the concern is a team of seven advisors, each reportedly earning about Ksh203,000 per month. Critics argue that these roles duplicate responsibilities already assigned to County Executive Committee members and chief officers, raising doubts about efficiency and proper use of public funds.
Senate Committee chair Moses Kajwang’ questioned the approach, stressing that leadership requires understanding and executing responsibilities directly rather than relying heavily on advisors.
His remarks reflect a concern that the current structure may be unnecessary and costly.
The financial burden has also drawn criticism from Edwin Sifuna, who pointed out that nearly Ksh10 million has been spent on advisors.
He emphasized that public funds must deliver visible results, something many residents feel is currently lacking.
Concerns have been amplified by Sakaja’s failure to appear before the Senate when called to explain the issue.
This absence has been viewed as a sign of weak accountability at a time when oversight is critical.
The situation is unfolding as Nairobi continues to face serious challenges, including deadly floods, displacement of families, and poor drainage systems. Many residents believe the focus should be on fixing these pressing issues rather than expanding administrative costs.
The controversy also comes amid criticism of a major cooperation deal with the national government, which has been questioned over limited public participation.
Together, these issues are shaping a growing debate about governance and priorities at City Hall.
Sakaja has said he is ready to make tough decisions, but leaders and residents alike are now looking for action.
Leave feedback about this