The appointment process for the Chairperson role has exposed serious flaws, particularly in the case of Kefa Seda and PS Chris Kiptoo.
One of the most alarming concerns is the inconsistent application of experience requirements. The position clearly demands a minimum level of experience, yet this requirement has not been uniformly applied.
While other candidates were thoroughly vetted based on their experience, Kefa Seda appears to have bypassed this crucial requirement even reports of massive bribery have been exposed.
This raises concerns about favoritism and manipulation of the selection process to favor a predetermined candidate.There is also a clear job group mismatch in this case. The position in question is designated for Job Group T, which is reserved for director-level officials.
However, Kefa Seda has never served as a director. His highest rank in public service has been that of a Deputy Director, making him ineligible for this role. The fact that he was even considered for the position suggests a deliberate bending of the rules to accommodate him.
This directly undermines the credibility of the entire selection process.The lack of transparency in the vetting process has further cast doubt on the legitimacy of the appointment.
The shortlisting committee failed to follow the established criteria, allowing Kefa Seda to progress despite clear disqualifications. This raises serious concerns about integrity, transparency, and accountability.
If the selection process is not conducted fairly, then public confidence in government appointments will continue to erode.
Integrity concerns surrounding Kefa Seda have also been ignored. Previous memos highlighting issues regarding his conduct were deliberately dismissed, creating the impression that due diligence was not followed.
By overlooking these integrity concerns, the appointing authorities, including PS Chris Kiptoo, have undermined public trust. The failure to address these red flags indicates that either there was a deliberate cover-up or that external forces influenced the process to favor Kefa Seda.
Given the numerous concerns surrounding his appointment, a lifestyle audit on Kefa Seda is necessary.
A thorough examination of his financial dealings and professional conduct should be carried out to determine whether he has been involved in any questionable activities.
The audit should not only focus on his current assets but also investigate his financial records before and after his involvement in Public-Private Partnerships (PPP).
This will help establish whether his appointment is based on merit or if corruption played a role in securing the position.There is also a need to investigate Kefa Seda’s overall performance in public service.
His track record must be scrutinized to determine his level of efficiency, accountability, and whether he has been linked to past controversies. If his record is questionable, then his appointment will only create more problems within the government. Public service positions should be given to individuals with a proven record of competence rather than those with political connections.
The appointment of Kefa Seda also shows clear signs of political influence. It appears that undue political patronage played a key role in his selection. PS Chris Kiptoo’s involvement in the process must be investigated to determine whether he used his position to influence the outcome.
Concerns have also emerged regarding the management of Public-Private Partnerships under KENHA, where Kefa Seda has been involved.
His role in these partnerships should be reviewed to determine whether there have been instances of mismanagement, favoritism, or conflicts of interest.
If he has previously mismanaged PPP projects, then allowing him to take on an even bigger role would be a serious mistake.
The Public Service Commission must be held accountable for failing to uphold selection standards in this case. The commission must explain why the rules were not strictly followed and why a candidate with clear disqualifications was allowed to proceed.
If there was external interference in the process, then those responsible must be identified and held accountable. Finally, PS Chris Kiptoo must clarify his role in this entire process.
If he has any personal or professional ties to Kefa Seda’s appointment, then he must declare them publicly. If there is any conflict of interest, then he must step aside from any further involvement.
Government appointments should be based on merit, not personal connections or political influence. The public deserves a fair and transparent selection process that ensures competent individuals take up leadership positions.
If this culture of favoritism and manipulation continues, then the credibility of government institutions will continue to deteriorate.
Leave feedback about this